Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Àü¹®°¡ ¹Ì¹é½Ã sealing techniqueÀÇ È¿À²¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

The effectiveness of sealing technique on in-office bleaching

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 33±Ç 5È£ p.463 ~ 471
ÀÌÀ±, ±Ç¼Ò¶õ, ¹ÚÁ¤¿ø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÀ± ( Lee Yoon ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
±Ç¼Ò¶õ (  ) - Michigan
¹ÚÁ¤¿ø ( Park Jeong-Won ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÀÇÇаú º¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â Àü¹®°¡ ¹Ì¹é½Ã Sealed bleaching techniqueÀÇ È¿À²°ú ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ split arch designÀÇ randomized clinical trialÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. 10¸íÀÇ °ÇÀüÇÑ ÀÚ¿¬Ä¡¸¦ °¡Áø ¼ºÀΠȯÀÚÀÇ »ó¾Ç ÀüÄ¡ºÎ¸¦ Á¿ìÃøÀ¸·Î ¹«ÀÛÀ§·Î ³ª´©¾î Àü¹®°¡ ¹Ì¹é ¼ú½ÄÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Brite powder (PacDent, Walnut, USA) ÇÑ ½ºÇ¬¿¡ 10 ¹æ¿ïÀÇ 3% °ú»êÈ­¼ö¼Ò¼ö¿Í 0.4mlÀÇ carbamide peroxide gel (KoolWhite, PacDent, Walnut, USA)À» È¥ÇÕÇÏ¿© ¹Ì¹éÁ¦·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÆíÃøÀÇ ¼¼ Ä¡¾Æ¸¦ ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ¸·Î ÁöÁ¤ÇÏ¿© Åë»óÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î Àü¹®°¡ ¹Ì¹éÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´°í, ¹Ý´ëÃøÀÇ ¼¼ Ä¡¾Æ´Â ½ÇÇ豺À¸·Î ¹Ì¹éÁ¦ À§¿¡ linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) wrapÀ» Àû¿ëÈÄ BT Cool lightÀ» 1½Ã°£ µ¿¾È Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ±¤È°¼ºÈ­ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ »öÁ¶´Â shadeguide¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ý°ú spectrophotometer¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ´Â µÎ °¡Áö ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¼úÀü, ¼úÈÄ, üũ½ÃÀÇ »öÁ¶ ÃøÁ¤ °á°ú¸¦ paired-t test·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Shade guide·Î Æò°¡ÇÑ °á°ú ½ÇÇ豺°ú ´ëÁ¶±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ¼úÈÄ¿Í Ã¼Å©½ÃÀÇ »öÁ¶¿Í ¼úÀüÀÇ »öÁ¶¿Í´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù (p<.05). ¶ÇÇÑ ¼úÀü¿¡´Â ´ëÁ¶±º°ú ½ÇÇè°ü°£ÀÇ »öÁ¶ÀÇ À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ¾ø¾ú´ø ¹Ý¸é ¼úÈÄ¿Í Ã¼Å© (p<.05)½Ã ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ µÎ ±º°£ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù (p<.05). Spectrophotometer·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °ªÀÇ °æ¿ì, ¼úÈÄ¿¡´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡¼­ , ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, üũ½Ã¿¡´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡¼­ , ½ÇÇè°ü¿¡¼­´Â ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ´Â ¼úÀü°ú ¼úÈĸ¦ ºñ±³ÇÑ °ª, ±×¸®°í ¼úÀü°ú üũ½Ã¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÑ °ª ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ½ÇÇ豺°ú ´ëÁ¶±º °£ÀÇ À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù (p<05). µû¶ó¼­ ÀÌ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëµÈ ¹Ì¹é ¼ú½ÄÀ» »ç¿ëÇÒ °æ¿ì, sealed bleaching techniqueÀÌ ¹Ì¹éÀÇ È¿À²¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÎ´Ù°í °á·ÐÁöÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.

This study investigated the clinical effectiveness and safety of sealed bleaching compared to conventional in-office bleaching using a randomized clinical trial of split arch design. Ten participants received a chairside bleaching treatment on the upper anterior teeth, and each side was randomly designated as sealed or control side. A mixture of Brite powder (PacDent, Walnut, USA), 3% hydrogen peroxide and carbamide peroxide (KoolWhite, PacDent, Walnut, USA) were used as bleaching agent. The control side was unwrapped and the experimental side was covered with a linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) wrap for sealed bleaching. The bleaching gel was light activated for 1 hour. The tooth shades were evaluated before treatment, after treatment, and at one week check up by means of a visual shade (VS) assessment using a value oriented shade guide and a computer assisted shade assessment using a spectrophotometer (SP). The data were analyzed by paired t-test. In the control and sealed groups, the visual shade scores after bleaching treatment and at check up showed statistically significant difference from the preoperative shade scores (p<.05). The shade scores of the sealed group were significantly lighter than the control immediately after bleaching and at the check-up appointment (p<0.05). Compared to prebleaching status, the values at post bleaching condition were for the control and sealed groups, respectively. The values at check up were for the control and sealed groups. values were greater for the sealed group both after bleaching (p<.05) and at check up (p<.05). In conclusion, both and shade score changes were greater for the sealed bleaching group than the conventional bleaching group, effectively demonstrating the improvement of effectiveness through sealing.

Å°¿öµå

in-office bleaching; LLDPE wrap; sealed bleaching technique; tooth shade

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI